Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Quadrimestre 3
Research Articles

Penamaan Jalan di Kecamatan Gisting: Kajian Lanskap Linguistik dan Onomastika

PDF
  • Rozana Argandari
Rozana Argandari
Magister Linguistik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69948/cill.41

Published 2025-12-10

Keywords

  • onomastics,
  • grammaticalization,
  • Gisting District,
  • linguistic landscape

How to Cite

Argandari, R. . (2025). Penamaan Jalan di Kecamatan Gisting: Kajian Lanskap Linguistik dan Onomastika. Crises on Languages and Literature, 2(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.69948/cill.41

Copyright (c) 2025 Rozana Argandari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The surrounding public is influenced by the correlations and conventions of language, which can be studied as a linguistic landscape. This study aims to investigate the philosophical significance of street naming conventions in the Gisting District, exploring how linguistic landscapes reflect and influence public perception and social identity. The combination of these two studies requires analyzing data from 30 texts and visual sources, as well as 18 structures, forms, and meanings in morphemes. The method used is a qualitative descriptive approach, employing a portrait method with photographs and a word-reading technique. The results of the research reveal the meanings of words, both as lexemes and as compound words, which possess philosophical significance in the context of language activity and the philosophy of language. Eventually, understanding the onomastic choices can aid in preserving the district's history and promoting tourism by highlighting significant local figures or events associated with the street names.

PDF

References

  1. Ainiala, T. (2016). Attitudes to Street Names in Helsinki. In L. Kostanski & G.Puzey (Eds.).
  2. Amrina, L. A. (2023). Paradigma Fenomenologis Dalam Kajian Sosio-Onomastika. Paradigma: Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya, 29(5), 56-66.
  3. Arifin, Zaenal dan Amran Tasai. 2010. Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
  4. Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A Look into the Linguistic Landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668385
  5. Batubara, L. H., Marpaung, A. A., Maulani, S., & Hertina, D. (t.t.). Peran Filsafat Bahasa Dalam Membangun Harmoni Sosial.
  6. Blommaert, J. ( 2013). Complexity, Accent, and Conviviality: Concluding Comments. Applied Linguistics, 34(5), 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt028
  7. Blommaert, Jan. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Ontario: Multilingual Matters.
  8. Bondaletov, V. D. (2016). Russkaya Onomastika (Onomastik Rusia). Stereotip.
  9. Chaer, Abdul. 2013. Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  10. Curtin, M. L. (2015). Creativity in polyscriptal typographies in the linguistic landscape of Taipei. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 236-243.
  11. Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT Eresco.
  12. Grbavac, I., Jaspaert, K., & Słowińska, D. (2014). The Linguistic Landscapes of Mostar and Leuven: A Comparative Study. Linguistics, culture and identity in foreign language education, 991.
  13. Gorter, D. (2006). Minorities and Language. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01295-5.
  14. Salikin, H., Sukarno, A. T. W., & Wisasongko, I. W. Language Deviation in Public Spaces in Indonesia (Linguistic Landscape).
  15. Haspelmath, S. (2010). Martin Haspelmath, Andrea D. Sims. Understanding Morphology.
  16. Koschade, A. (2016). Willkommen in Hahndorf: a linguistic landscape of Hahndorf, South Australia. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 692-716.
  17. Kridalaksana. (2011). Kamus Linguistik Edisi Keempat. Gramedia Pustaka.
  18. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 16(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970 161002.
  19. Manan, S. A., David, M. K., Dumanig, F. P., & Naqeebullah, K. (2015). Politics, economics and identity: Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 31-50.
  20. Nugroho, Deni I & Mastoyo, Tri J.K (2024) yang berjudul “Nama-Nama Produk Makanan Instan di Indonesia: Kajian Onomastika.
  21. Pateda, Mansoer. 2010. Semantik Leksikal (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  22. Pavey, E. L. (2010). The structure of language: An introduction to grammatical analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Puzey, G. (2016). Linguistic Landscapes. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford of Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 476–496). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  24. Tang, M., Mansur, A. H., & Ismail, I. (2021). LANDASAN FILOSOFIS PENDIDIKAN: Telaah Pemikiran Socrates, Plato dan Aristoteles. Moderation| Journal of Islamic Studies Review, 1(1), 47-56.
  25. Ullman, Stephen. 2012. Pengantar Semantik (Semantics, An Introduction to the Science of Meaning). Diterjemahkan oleh Sumarsono. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  26. Wijana, I. D. P. (2014). Bahasa, Kekuasaan, dan Resistansinya: Studi Tentang Nama-Nama Badan Usaha di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Humaniora,
  27. 26(1), 56–64
  28. Wijana, I. D. P. W. P. (2016). Bahasa dan etnisitas: studi tentang nama-nama rumah makan Padang. Linguistik Indonesia, 34(2), 195-206.