Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Quadrimestre 2
Research Articles

Project-Based Learning as an Alternative Approach to Enhancing EFL Students' Grammar-Based Writing

Endang Lestari
Plantation Management Study Program, LPP Polytechnic of Yogyakarta
Rini Zahrani
Universitas Terbuka Indonesia
Adam Al Arfan
Universitas Terbuka Indonesia

Published 2026-08-24

Keywords

  • CAR; Grammar ; PjBL; Writing Skill

How to Cite

Lestari, E., Zahrani, R., & Al Arfan, A. (2026). Project-Based Learning as an Alternative Approach to Enhancing EFL Students’ Grammar-Based Writing. Crises on Languages and Literature, 3(2), 115—130. https://doi.org/10.65808/cill.52

Abstract

Writing is one of the most challenging skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners because it requires grammatical accuracy, adequate vocabulary, and the ability to organize ideas coherently. Preliminary observations in a public junior secondary school in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, revealed that many ninth-grade students experienced difficulties in constructing sentences using the present and past continuous tenses, resulting in frequent grammatical errors and low writing achievement. This study aimed to improve students’ writing skills through the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL), with the Jigsaw technique integrated in the second cycle to strengthen collaborative learning. The study employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) based on the Kemmis and McTaggart model and involved 25 ninth-grade students. Data were collected through writing tests, classroom observations, field notes, and documentation and analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods. The findings showed that the implementation of PjBL, supported by Jigsaw in Cycle II, improved students’ grammatical accuracy, sentence construction, classroom participation, and learning engagement. The average student score increased from 63.20 in the pre-cycle to 73.67 in Cycle I and reached 84.00 in Cycle II. In Cycle I, 18 of the 25 students (72%) achieved the minimum mastery criterion, while seven students (28%) did not. Following the instructional revision and integration of Jigsaw in Cycle II, all students (100%) successfully met the minimum mastery criterion. Students also demonstrated fewer grammatical errors, particularly in the use of auxiliary verbs (to be), -ing verb forms, and continuous tense structures. In addition, students became more actively involved in peer discussions, more confident in sharing their understanding, and more engaged in collaborative writing activities. These findings suggest that PjBL, when complemented by the Jigsaw technique, can provide a meaningful and collaborative learning environment for enhancing grammar-based writing skills and promoting active engagement in EFL classrooms.

References

  1. Arends, R. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. McGraw-Hill Companies.
  2. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). Thejigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  3. Arsyad L, S., Safitri, M., & Natsir, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian bahasa dan sastra Inggris. Jakarta: Kencana.
  4. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  5. Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832400
  6. Bram, B., & Angelina, P. (2022). Indonesian Tertiary Education Students’ Academic Writing Setbacks and Solutions. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i3.22043
  7. Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
  8. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
  9. Hidayah, N. (2018). Pengaruh kemampuan kognitif dan psikomotorik terhadap penguasaan keterampilan menulis.
  10. Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing. Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667251
  11. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Hiver, P. (2025). Complex Dynamic Systems Theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, Fourth Edition (pp. 217–244). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003491118-9
  12. Namaziandost, E., Gilakjani, A. P., & Hidayatullah. (2020). Enhancing pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension through the use of Jigsaw technique. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1738833
  13. Nassaji, H. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of grammar instruction in second language learning: A review of the literature. Language Teaching Research.
  14. Ningsih, S., Susanti, E., & Utami, A. S. (2020). The correlation between grammar mastery and students’ writing ability in descriptive text.
  15. Richards, J. C., & Pun, J. (2022). Teacher strategies in implementing English-medium instruction. ELT Journal, 76(2), 227–237.
  16. Saputri, R. W., Ardi, H., & Fitriani, S. S. (2023). The implementation of project-based learning to improve students’ writing skill in descriptive text. Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 125-135.
  17. Sari, E., Zaim, M., & Radjab, D. (2020). Project-based learning in teaching writing: A case study in vocational high school. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 170-179.
  18. Argawati, N. O., & Suryani, L. (2020). Project-Based Learning In Teaching Writing: The Implementation And Students’opinion. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 219-226.
  19. Usman, B., & Anwar, K. (2021). English language curriculum and material development. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.
  20. Wang, M., Alavi, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The impact of jigsaw cooperative learning on academic motivation, academic hardiness, and self-efficacy of English Foreign Language learners. Learning and Motivation, 84, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101940.
  21. Wiranto, R., & Sukardi, S. (2021). Penerapan project based learning dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. Selegi, S. F., & Sukardi, S. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving dan Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas VII SMP N 15 Palembang. Jurnal Swarnabhumi: Jurnal Geografi dan Pembelajaran Geografi, 6(1), 1-6.
  22. Yong, M. F., & Saad, W. Z. (2023). Fuelling Grammar Mastery and 21st Century Skills Through Project-Based Learning. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 31(1), 99–124. DOI: 10.47836/pjssh.31.1.06.