Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Quadrimestre 1
Research Articles

Pemilihan Bahasa Arab dalam Pengantar Dakwah pada Komunitas Yayasan Amanisya Qur’an Learning

PDF
  • Alya Malida
Alya Malida
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69948/cill.12

Published 2025-04-05

Keywords

  • language selection,
  • context of preaching,
  • code-switching,
  • code-mixing,
  • Arabic-Indonesian

How to Cite

Malida, A. (2025). Pemilihan Bahasa Arab dalam Pengantar Dakwah pada Komunitas Yayasan Amanisya Qur’an Learning . Crises on Languages and Literature, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.69948/cill.12

Copyright (c) 2025 Alya Malida

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Language selection in the context of preaching is a complex phenomenon and important to understand in religious communication. This study aims to reveal the patterns of language selection that occur in the Amanisya Qur'an Learning (AQL) Foundation community, as well as the factors that influence it. The research method used is a qualitative study with a sociolinguistic approach. Data were collected through participant observation. Data analysis was carried out in three stages, namely (1) data reduction, (2) data presentation, and (3) conclusion. The study's results showed variations in language selection between various interaction contexts, such as preaching assemblies and teaching the Qur'an. This study's results indicate that two dominant codes are used in the community, namely the Indonesian and Arabic codes. From the speech found, there is a phenomenon of code-switching and code-mixing between the Indonesian (BI), Arabic (BA), and English (BING) codes. Moreover, the factors that influence language selection are (1) participants, (2) situations, (3) speech content, and (4) interaction functions. These findings provide better insight into the dynamics of communication in da'wah and can be a basis for developing more effective communication strategies in da'wah activities in society.

PDF

References

  1. Appel, R & Musyken, P. (1987). Language Contact and Bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.
  2. Asli, K. L. B. T. D. Pemilihan Bahasa dalam Kalangan Peserta Latihan dan Dakwah Orang.
  3. Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. 2010. Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Clark. Herbert H. 1997. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dimitracopoulou. Ioanna 1990. Conversational Competence and Social Development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Fasold, Ralp. 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
  7. Fishman, J. A. (1972). The Sociology of Language. Rowley: Newbury House.
  8. Groesjean, Fracois. 1982. Life with Two Languages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  9. Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Arnold.
  10. Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York: Pearson Longman.
  11. Nurfadila, Y., Sariono, A., & Hariyadi, E. (2019). Pemilihan bahasa pada masyarakat etnik jawa di dusun gumuk banji, desa kencong, kecamatan kencong, kabupaten jember. Semiotika: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra dan Linguistik, 20(1), 33-44.
  12. Poedjosoedarmo, S. (1978). Alih Kode dan Campur Kode. Yogyakarta: Balai Peneliti Bahasa.
  13. Saldina, A. N., & Suhandano, S. (2023). Pemilihan Bahasa dalam Ceramah Agama Islam di Tembilahan, Riau. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra dan Linguistik, 24(1), 20-30.
  14. Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Sudaryanto, 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
  16. Sumarsono. 2017. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.
  17. Tihurua, L. A., & Shin, C. (2022). Pemilihan Bahasa Di Kampung Sepa, Maluku Tengah, Indonesia: the Language Choice in Sepa Village, Central Mollucas, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage, 6(1).
  18. Wardhaugh, Ronald 19988. An Introduction to Sosiolinguistics. Oxford: Brasil Blackwell.
  19. Weinreich. Uriel 1970. Language in Contact. The Hague. Mouton.